![]() ![]() She has spent many years studying the microflora of drinking water and biofilm and various processes used to produce drinking water. Chlorine has been linked to cancer and foetal damage and studying whether chlorine could be replaced by other methods is therefore relevant,” says Catherine Paul, associate professor in Water Resources Engineering and Applied Microbiology at Lund University. “Chlorine is an effective way to minimize growth of bacteria, but there is a risk of potential health impacts from byproducts that form with the chlorine. Chlorine, however, which in the studied piping system was added in the form of monochloramine, is not wholly unproblematic. These bacteria have adapted to life in the presence of chlorine, which otherwise has the primary task to kill bacteria, particularity bacteria that can make humans sick.Īn ordinary glass of drinking water contains a lot of harmless bacteria. On the inside of pipe walls is a thin, slippery coating, called a biofilm, which protects and supports bacteria. Just as human intestines contain a rich bacterial flora, many types of bacteria thrive in our drinking water and the pipes that transport them. ![]() The study suggests that chlorine is not always needed if the filtration is efficient-and that predatory bacteria could perhaps be used to purify water in the future. The result? An increase in bacteria, of course, but after a while something surprising happened: a harmless predatory bacteria grew in numbers and ate most of the other bacteria. In a unique study carried out in drinking water pipes in Sweden, researchers from Lund University and the local water company tested what would happen if chlorine was omitted from drinking water. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |